Voice marking | Proper marker | no | |
Voice marking | Lookalike marker | no | |
Voice marking | Synthetic marker | n/a | |
Voice marking | Analytic marker | n/a | |
Flagging | S-argument flagging | n/a | Main argument retains its flagging despite the fact that O is unexpressed. (K.S.)
'The absolutive case marker in Burushaski is -Ø, and this case functions as the case for the only participant of intransitive clauses [..], the direct object participant of transitives [...], (Yoshioka 2012: 50) |
Flagging | P-oblique flagging | n/a | |
Flagging | P-oblique unflagging | n/a | |
Flagging | P-oblique flagging variation | n/a | |
Indexation | S-argument indexed | yes | Concerning the personal suffix, the marking system is dichotomous: a personal suffix agrees with the subject argument S/A, and no suffix is used to mark the object arguments O/T/R (Yoshioka 2012: 243). |
Indexation | S-argument indexation conditioned | no | |
P-individuation properties | P incorporated: Generic (non-specific) | n/a | |
P-individuation properties | P incorporated: Indefinite (non-specific) | n/a | |
P-individuation properties | P incorporated: Referential | n/a | |
P-individuation properties | P oblique: Generic (non-specific) | n/a | |
P-individuation properties | P oblique: Indefinite (non-specific) | n/a | |
P-individuation properties | P oblique: Referential | n/a | |
P-individuation properties | P eliminated: Generic (non-specific) | yes | Considering the circumstances mentioned above, it is concluded that the likelihood of objects would not be relavant to the choice of stem. The only effective conditions are that H-class objects require the personal prefix slot, and that entirely unknown objects, whose overtness is mostly low or zero, demand stems without the slot (Yoshioka 2012: 260). |
P-individuation properties | P eliminated: Indefinite (non-specific) | yes | Considering the circumstances mentioned above, it is concluded that the likelihood of objects would not be relavant to the choice of stem. The only effective conditions are that H-class objects require the personal prefix slot, and that entirely unknown objects, whose overtness is mostly low or zero, demand stems without the slot (Yoshioka 2012: 260). |
P-individuation properties | P eliminated: Referential | no | FYI: It must be recalled that Burushaski freely uses implicit subjects or complements for non salient thematic arguments (anaphoric or indefinite). Non salient objects need not have any morphological reflexes in a sentence, unlike subjects which are necessarily indicated at least through subject agreement (Morin and Tiffou 1988: 498). |
P-oblique affectedness | Less affected P-oblique | n/a | |
P-constraining properties | Animacy constraints on P-oblique demotion | n/a | |
P-constraining properties | Person constraints on P-oblique demotion | n/a | |
P-constraining properties | Number constraints on P-oblique demotion | n/a | |